;.

Court Strikes Out Nnamdi Kanu’s Motion for Transfer from Sokoto Prison

Court Strikes Out Nnamdi Kanu’s Motion for Transfer from Sokoto Prison

 A Federal High Court in Abuja has struck out a motion filed by Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), seeking an order for his transfer from the Sokoto Correctional Centre back to the Department of State Services (DSS) facility in Abuja.

According to Daily Post, the court ruled on Monday that the application was incompetent and improperly brought, noting that it failed to meet the required legal standards for such a request.

Court’s Ruling

In delivering the ruling, the presiding judge held that Kanu’s legal team did not properly address the procedural requirements governing motions before the court. As a result, the judge struck out the application without considering its substantive merits.

The court, however, left room for Kanu’s lawyers to refile the motion in line with due process, should they choose to pursue the request again.

Background to the Application

Kanu’s counsel had asked the court to order his transfer from Sokoto Prison, arguing that the current location was far from his legal team and family, and that returning him to Abuja would make it easier to prepare for his ongoing trial.

The defence also raised concerns about access to legal representation and the logistical challenges posed by his detention in a facility outside the Federal Capital Territory.

Next Steps in the Case

Following the ruling, the trial in Kanu’s substantive case is expected to continue on its scheduled dates. His legal team has not ruled out filing a fresh application in compliance with the court’s directives.

Public and Legal Reactions

The decision has sparked reactions among Kanu’s supporters and legal observers, with some interpreting it as a strictly procedural ruling rather than a dismissal of the underlying issues raised by the defence.

The Federal Government, through its prosecuting team, has maintained that Kanu is being held in line with existing court orders and security considerations.

Source: Daily Post

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post